(1809-1882)
![]() |
British
scientist, who laid the foundation of modern evolutionary
theory with his concept of the development of all forms
of life through the slow-working process of natural
selection. His work has been of major influence on the
life and Earth sciences and on modern thought in general. Born in Shrewsbury, Shropshire, on February 12, 1809, Darwin was the fifth child of a wealthy and sophisticated family. His maternal grandfather was the successful china and pottery entrepreneur Josiah Wedgwood; his paternal grandfather was the well-known 18th-century doctor, poet, and savant Erasmus Darwin. His father was a successful provincial physician with a dominant personality; his mother died when Charles was only eight, after which time he was looked after by his elder sisters. Known as a rather ordinary student, Darwin left Shrewsbury School in 1825 and went to the University of Edinburgh to study medicine. Finding himself squeamish at the sight of human blood and suffering, Darwin left Edinburgh and went to the University of Cambridge, in preparation for a life as a Church of England clergyman, which he thought would best allow him to pursue his increasing interest in natural history. |
At Cambridge he
came under the influence of two figures: Adam Sedgwick, a
geologist, and John Stevens Henslow, a botanist. Henslow
not only helped build Darwin's self-confidence but also
taught his student to be a meticulous and painstaking
observer of natural phenomena and collector of specimens.
After graduating from Cambridge in 1831, the 22-year-old
Darwin was taken aboard the English survey ship HMS
Beagle, largely on Henslow's recommendation, as an unpaid
naturalist on a scientific expedition round the world.
This voyage, which began on December 27, 1831, determined
Darwin's whole future career. Voyage of the Beagle |
At the time, most
geologists adhered to the so-called catastrophe theory
that the Earth had experienced a succession of creations
of animal and plant life, and that each creation had been
destroyed by a sudden catastrophe, such as an upheaval or
convulsion of the Earth's surface (see Geology: History
of Geological Thought: 18th and 19th Centuries).
According to one prominent version of this theory, the
most recent catastrophe was the Flood of Noah, as
recorded in the Bible. It wiped away all land animals
except those taken into the ark (plants and fishes
presented a problem); the rest were visible only as
fossils. According to the catastrophists, species of
plants and animals were individually created and
immutable, that is, unchangeable for all time. The catastrophist viewpoint (but not the immutability of species) was challenged by the British geologist Sir Charles Lyell in his three-volume work Principles of Geology (1830-1833). Lyell maintained that the Earth's surface is undergoing constant change, the result of natural forces operating uniformly since the Creation (which he argued was millions of years ago). |
![]() |
Darwin was given the first volume of Lyell's work just before he left England, and the subsequent volumes were sent to him in South America. Lyell's uniformitarian principles provided him with exactly the framework he needed for his own geological observations. Lyell argued that active geological change was still going on apace, and Darwin was especially impressed with an earthquake he experienced while in Chile that actually raised the coastline by several feet. Beyond that, however, he realized that some of his own observations on the local relationships between fossils and living plants and animals cast doubt on Lyell's vague views on the special creation of new species. Darwin noted that some fossils of supposedly extinct species in a particular geographical area closely resembled living species of the same region. In the Galápagos Islands, 1,000 km (600 mi) off the coast of Ecuador, he also observed that each island supported its own form of tortoise (see Giant Tortoise), mocking bird, and finch; the various forms were closely related but differed in structure and eating habits from island to island. These observations raised the question, for Darwin, of possible links between distinct but similar species.
Theories of Natural
Selection
When Darwin returned to England in 1836, he was a mature
scientist. His letters and packages of specimens sent to
Sedgwick, Henslow, and others during his voyage had established
his reputation at home. He immediately threw himself into the
work of preparing his share of an extensive report of the
scientific discoveries made during the Beagle voyage, and editing
his own travel diary for publication. Darwin's Journal of
Researches (1839) achieved popular as well as scientific acclaim,
and it was followed in 1844 and 1846 by further volumes on
volcanic islands and on the geology of South America.
None of this published work by Darwin challenged the assumption
that biological species are immutable. However, in July 1837
Darwin opened a private notebook entitled "Transmutation of
Species", in which he recorded observations and speculations
bearing on the question (which he subsequently called "that
mystery of mysteries"). His thinking on how organisms evolve
was brought into sharp focus in September 1838, when he read An
Essay on the Principle of Population (originally published in
1798) by the British economist Thomas Robert Malthus. Malthus
observed that all biological species, including human beings,
possess a far greater reproductive capacity than can actually be
realized. For human beings, there was always a potential
disparity between the means of subsistence and the number of
mouths to feed. Human population growth was thus limited by dire
checks, such as famine, disease, and war.
Darwin immediately saw the relevance of Malthus's work for his
own thinking: if all the offspring of a plant or animal cannot
survive to reproductive maturity, there must be biological
reasons why those that survive, do so. This constant press, which
he called natural selection, was the motor of biological change
over time. In 1838, 1842, and 1844 he produced increasingly
elaborate private versions of his evolutionary theory; the latter
is virtually a précis of the famous book that he eventually
published in 1859.
In the meantime, Darwin had married, in 1839, his first cousin,
Emma Wedgwood, and they soon afterwards left London for a small
estate, Down House, in Downe, Kent. His father had left him
independently wealthy. At Down, he and his wife had ten children,
three of whom died in infancy. By then, too, Darwin was beginning
to suffer from an illness that was to plague him intermittently
for the rest of his life. It produced shaking, nausea, dry
retching, and great prostration. It left him, by his own
testimony, unable to work for days and weeks on end, although his
output of scientific books and correspondence continued to be
prodigious. The source of his illness will probably never be
completely unravelled, although it possibly had a large
psychosomatic component. It also relieved him of many social,
professional, and domestic obligations, thus enabling him to
concentrate on what mattered most to him: his work.
In 1856, after eight years of sustained work on fossil and living
barnacles (published in two large volumes), Darwin at last began
work on a volume that he intended to call Natural Selection. It
was interrupted in 1858, when Alfred Russel Wallace, a young
naturalist then working in Malaysia, sent Darwin his own brief
sketch of evolution through natural selection. Lyell, who had
been privy to Darwin's own evolutionary thinking, arranged for a
joint presentation of Wallace's sketch and a brief essay by
Darwin at a meeting of the Linnean Society in London. Darwin was
then stimulated to write On the Origin of Species by Means of
Natural Selection. It sold out on the first day of publication in
November 1859 and remains one of the greatest scientific
treatises ever written. It went through five further editions in
Darwin's lifetime.
Darwin's was by no means the first treatise to argue for the
change of biological species over time. His grandfather, Erasmus
Darwin, had developed his own evolutionary ideas in a series of
medical writings and poems. The French naturalist Jean-Baptiste
Lamarck, in his Philosophie Zoologique (1809), expounded a
comprehensive evolutionary synthesis, based on the commonly held
notion that characteristics acquired in an organism's lifetime
could be passed on to the offspring. He famously argued that the
giraffe's long neck was the result of generations of stretching
to reach leaves higher in the trees. This form of inheritance was
described as "Lamarckian". In 1844 the Scottish
publisher Robert Chambers anonymously published his own
evolutionary synthesis, entitled Vestiges of the Natural History
of Creation. Darwin knew all these works, and in later editions
of the Origin provided a historical introduction. Their influence
on him was general rather than particular, however, as revealed
by the differences in his theory.
Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection is essentially
that, because of the population pressure as described by Malthus,
the young born to any species compete intensely for survival.
Those young that survive to reproduce tend to embody favourable
natural variations (however slight the advantage may be)-the
process of natural selection-and these variations are passed on
by heredity. Darwin recognized that his understanding of the
mechanisms of heredity was limited, but he insisted that as long
as inherited variation does occur, his theory would work.
Therefore, some members of each generation will be able to adapt
themselves to changing environmental conditions (changes in food
supply, predators, or climate, for example), and this gradual and
continuous process of adaptation is the source of the evolution
of species. Within Darwin's vast conceptual scheme, extinct and
present-day species of plants and animals were represented as a
kind of "tree of life", in which closely related modern
organisms are descended from common ancestors. Moreover, he
provided additional support for the older concept that the Earth
itself is not static but evolving.
In a deliberate attempt to make his ideas more acceptable, Darwin
did not discuss human evolution in the Origin, confining himself
to a single sentence: "Light will be thrown on the origin of
man and his history". Nevertheless, his private notebooks
make it clear that he recognized from the beginning that human
beings were also part of the evolutionary process. He elaborated
his views on human evolution in two later works (see below), but
the popular idea that he argued that human beings are descended
from apes is false: within his scheme, human beings and other
primates, such as modern apes and monkeys, are all descended from
common, more primitive ancestors.
Reactions to the Theory
Darwin was extremely anxious about how his theory would be
received, but, a shy man, he declined to debate his work
publicly. Thomas Henry Huxley ("Darwin's Bulldog")
became his most ardent spokesman. Reaction to the Origin was
immediate. Some biologists argued that, since there was no
laboratory proof of Darwin's theories, it must remain a
hypothesis. Others criticized Darwin's concept of variation,
pointing out that he could explain neither the origin of
variations nor how they were passed between generations. This
particular scientific objection was not answered until the birth
of modern genetics in the early 20th century (see Mendel's Laws).
Still others believed that natural selection was not sufficiently
powerful to produce the changes Darwin attributed to it. In fact,
Darwin's work convinced many scientists of the fact of biological
evolution, but his theories were doubted by many until the early
20th century. The most publicized attacks on Darwin's ideas,
however, came not from scientists but from religious opponents
(or scientists acting out of religious belief). The thought that
living things had evolved by natural processes denied the special
creation of humankind and seemed to place humanity on a plane
with the animals; both of these ideas were serious challenges to
orthodox theological opinion.
Huxley himself (who coined the word "agnostic" to
describe his own religious opinions) was never afraid of a tussle
with the theologians, most famously in 1860 with Samuel
Wilberforce, Bishop of Oxford. The idea of man descended from
apes was already prominent by then, and Wilberforce patronizingly
asked Huxley "Was it through his grandfather or his
grandmother that he claimed his descent from a monkey?"
Huxley replied that he would rather be related to an ape than to
a man of intelligence who used his eloquence to obscure the
"real point at issue". Darwin himself was cagey about
expressing himself publicly on religious matters, partly from
timidity, partly to avoid causing pain to his devout wife Emma.
We know from his letters and private notebooks that he gradually
lost his own faith and can be said to have vacillated between
atheism and agnosticism.
Later Years
Darwin kept revising successive editions of the Origin, to
account for various scientific criticisms that were raised. In
addition, he produced a series of monographs that elaborated
different aspects of matters discussed in the Origin. The
Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication (1868)
expanded the analogy between "artificial" and natural
selection, pointing out that animal and plant breeders could
produce significant new variations simply by selectively breeding
offspring. "How much more powerful than man," he
insisted, "is Nature herself." The Descent of Man
(1871) tackled the emotive issue of human evolution (which he had
avoided in the Origin), and also developed a theory of sexual
selection as another mechanism of organic change, complementing
natural selection. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and
Animals (1872) was essentially an essay in comparative
psychology, drawing on Darwin's close observations of the early
development of his own children.
Darwin was also a gifted botanist who used his own gardens at
Down to great effect. In the last two decades of his life he
wrote five botanical books, describing a wide range of
observational and experimental work. It included the role of
insects on cross-fertilization; the adaptations of climbing
plants such as ivy; the intriguing sensitive plants that respond
to touch and are sometimes insectivorous (such as the Venus
flytrap); and the important function of the humble earthworm in
breaking down leaves and turning earth into fertile soil.
By the time he died on April 19, 1882, Darwin was a world-famous
scientist. He had been given many with honours and awards, such
as fellowship of the Royal Society, and honorary membership in
many scientific academies. Despite the controversial nature of
many of his ideas, the scientific establishment recognized his
worth and he was buried in Westminster Abbey.
Darwin's Legacy
Although Darwin was not the first evolutionist, modern
evolutionary biology begins with him. He was the first to marshal
enough scientific evidence to convince his fellow scientists that
biological species can change over time by natural means.
However, the principal mechanism he proposed-natural
selection-was not properly appreciated until the 20th century,
when the work of biologists such as John Burdon Haldane, Sewell
Wright, and Julian Huxley (T. H. Huxley's grandson) combined
Mendelian genetics and population dynamics to produce what was
called Neo-Darwinism. This synthesis remains the basis of much
contemporary research in evolutionary biology.
During Darwin's lifetime, his vision of struggle as a brute fact
of biological life was more widely accepted. The English social
theorist Herbert Spencer coined the phrase "survival of the
fittest" as an alternative to Darwin's less-loaded
"natural selection", and social Darwinism (more
accurately called "social Spencerianism") became the
basis of much social and economic thought. In particular,
evolutionary ideas were used to explain many social phenomena and
to justify the dominant capitalistic and imperialist ideology of
the age. As evolution and development became fundamental features
of the modern world-view, few areas of human life and endeavour
escaped an evolutionary analysis, although in many cases it has
been misunderstood or misappplied
.
Aleister Crowley - Anne Rice - Anton Szandor LaVey - Arthur Schopenhauer - Charles Baudelaire - Charles Darwin - Edgar Allan Poe - Friedrich Nietzsche - Howard Phillips Lovecraft - J.R.R. Tolkien - Karl Marx - Lord Byron - Marquis de Sade - Mary Shelley - Sigmund Freud - Stephen King